According to Gabriel Lencioni, Gustavo Gonçalves, Matheus Teles, Gustavo Traldi, Gabriel Pellegrine, João Guilherme Marchetti and João Marcelo Lopes, football is much more than 22 players chasing the ball. It is something that brings family and friends together, it is an art that provides healthy discussions in a tone of equality between people, regardless of the social class of each one, and for this reason, it has the ability to break barriers. In the case of ดูบอลสด this is very true.
For Caio Villela, Rafaela Rossi and Adriana Milani, football are directly linked to people’s passion. It is a show that has the ability to cheer, sadden, thrill, arouse an inexplicable passion and unexpected reactions in the fans.
Finally, João Victor Minicelli considers the sport a mixture of emotions from the fans. When asked about the violence present in some games, João considers extreme fanaticism as the cause of the problem. However, he believes it is not the fault of the sport, so much so that it also occurs in politics and religion.
In my opinion, the issue of violence in sport is understandable, although I do not agree. In times of political and financial crises in the country, people find in football a way to vent their problems and feelings. As in a war, if the warrior who represents his people is defeated, there is popular discontent. However, there are some ways to get around the situation and demonstrate your dissatisfaction without generating violence.
Why does football receive so much support in contemporary society?
On what properties of sense are the passion for this sport based?
This is what the French anthropologist Christian Bromberger’s book, ” Meanings of the popular passion for football clubs “, seeks to answer and what I will try to briefly present. The work is the result of a conference held by the author at the University of Buenos Aires, in 2001, at the invitation of members of the interdisciplinary area of sports studies at the Faculty of Philosophy and Letters.
There is nothing new in the author’s questions, they have been recurrent in football research. The interesting thing about his work lies in the way he builds his explanatory structure. Seeking to avoid abstractions that tend to naturalize the enthusiasm that surrounds football, such as purely aesthetic explanations, he turns to the social factors that shaped its diffusion and popularity.
Before presenting his thesis, the author problematizes what he calls “the four discourses of fashion” about the popularity of football, which he considers very reductionist. The first one treats football like the opium of the people. It would, therefore, be a sport at the “service” of hegemonic powers, nationalist and/or capitalist interests. The mass of the population would have their attention diverted from the so-called important issues, such as politics, to football. For Bromberger, such an explanation rules out the fact that in numerous moments in history football has been the catalyst for popular consciousness. Among other examples, the author rescues the strength of the Revolutionary XI team, representative of the National Liberation Front of Algeria, which at the end of the 1950s fought, through football, for the decolonization of Africa.